A long time ago, it used to be comforting, to hear the words "One Size Fits All".  As though our interests were surely represented within that catch-all, assuring us that we weren't going to get left out in the rain.  You could safely make that impulse-driven purchase, bring it home (or have it delivered), and know with certainty, that you wouldn't be disappointed.  It's almost laughable to think that we subscribed to this way of thinking for about 50 years.  But thankfully, we live, work and play in a world where it's not about one-size-fits-all, and the only things we'll accept as such, are wristwatches, and bicycle helmets! (unless you have a gargantuan sized cranium)

And so it is with your IT environment -"One-Size-Fits-All" feels too much like hand-cuffs (which coincidentally are also one-size-fits-all).  We've done away with the notion that a solution that's optimized for a Fortune 500, is going to be at all suitable for a medium-sized business with almost 1,000 employees.  While both organizations might have a strategic imperative around workspace mobility, and have set out to virtualize the desktops of say, 5% of their workforce, they'll approach this problem in two completely different ways.

• One of these organizations will have an extensive , multi-tiered networking and security infrastructure, optimized for virtual machine traffic, the other may not.
• One of these organizations will have a mature SAN infrastructure in place, with embedded resources and expertise, and lots of existing mission-critical data already housed there.  The other may not.
• One of these organizations will have a high percentage of virtualized workloads and a highly automated/orchestrated environment for rapidly spinning up new infrastructure.  The other may not.

Certainly these two environments are not going to take the same solution approach to deploying virtual desktops?  They will however, share many of the same key objectives/demands: future proof scalability, resiliency, streamlined provisioning and operations, consistent user experience for the 1^stuser as well as the 1000^th.  And they'll want all of this with the lowest possible TCO.

Last month, Cisco introduced our expanded suite of solution architectures for desktop virtualization.  This portfolio was struck with the objective of ensuring our customers would never have to settle for a One-Size-Fits-All approach to deploying VDI, recognizing that they're deploying this solution from a multitude of possible starting points in their IT maturity.  With four new solution architectures, each built on Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS), and each backed by design guides and reference configurations co-developed with industry-leading partners in storage and storage-optimization technologies, we've taken the risk and guesswork out of choosing the deployment methodology that's right-sized for your organization.  Check out my friend Ashok's more detailed post on the new reference architecture portfolio.

This is about desktop virtualization on your terms-solutions that are tailor-made, and fit the TCO and scalability objectives specific to your business, whether you're the Fortune 500 or a small/medium-sized business.  So, buy that new Giro bicycle helmet with confidence... Know that the Casio G-Shock you saw on Amazon will fit your wrist just fine.  But when it comes to your solution for virtual desktops, choose the architectural approach tailor-made for your environment.