In response to a lawsuit by NetChoice, a federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order against an impending Ohio law that would mandate parental consent for children using social media apps. The judge expressed concerns about the law's constitutionality, stating it may unduly restrict free speech and lacks narrow tailoring to its intended goals.

The law, part of a state budget bill signed by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine in July, was set to take effect on January 15. It not only mandates parental consent for children under 16 to use social media but also requires companies to provide parents with privacy guidelines. Republican Lt. Gov. Jon Husted expressed disappointment in the judge's decision, accusing tech companies of being disingenuous in the legislative process.

NetChoice had filed the lawsuit against GOP Attorney General Dave Yost, having previously succeeded in legal challenges against similar restrictions in California and Arkansas.

Why does it matter?

As social media face growing scrutiny regarding their platforms' impact on teen mental health, this case adds to the string of victories for tech companies against legislation that would impose greater accountability on them. It is part of the ongoing legal battles across states, underscoring the persistent tension between protecting minors and preserving digital liberties.