ZDNet

Last week, I opined about how I want a touchscreen MacBook. The idea isn't new, of course, but it was rekindled after using Microsoft'sSurface Laptop Studio , a laptop that I continue to use, and in fact, am writing this very story on. Naturally, any article that involves changing how we interact with our devices -- especially Apple devices -- can spark a lot of conversation and debate.

For example, ZDNet's social team posted a poll on LinkedIn asking followers if they wish their MacBook had a touchscreen. In addition to 25 comments, there were a total of 1,529 votes. The results showed that there's a clear desire from those who participated for Apple to add touch to the MacBook with 46% of those who took part in the poll answering yes. In second place, at 35%, are those who answered that they don't want a touchscreen Mac.

Recommends

The best Macs

Apple's Mac lineup can be confusing as the company transitions from Intel processors to its own Apple Silicon processors. But we're here to help.

Read now

I know this is a controversial topic, and one that's been debated for years now. Many of the comments and emails I personally received stated that a touchscreen Mac already exists in the form of an iPad. But, I can tell you as an avidiPad Pro user, Apple's tablet is no Mac.

Also:How to use an iPad Pro to power your home office

And I have no issues with that. In fact, it's part of the reason why I enjoy using an iPad so much -- there's a level of simplistic complexity to iPadOS that I find valuable.

Adding touch interactions to MacOS will be a tricky endeavor, should Apple ever fully embrace it. But like I said in my original post, a lot of that groundwork has already been done. Control Center on MacOS looks almost identical to iPadOS, just with a few extra Mac-like interface choices. However, the buttons and sliders are all slightly larger than they need to be for a traditional mouse and pointer.

Late last year, after Apple released the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro laptops with a notch at the top of the display for the front-facing camera, company executives talked withThe Wall Street Journalabout why it hasn't added a touchscreen or Face ID to its Mac lineup. The reason there isn't a touchscreen Mac yet? Because the iPad is the best touch computer.

Here's the thing, though. I don't totally buy Apple's answer. The company is notorious for dismissing ideas and product changes, only to later embrace them with enough spin to make you dizzy. Remember how Steve Jobs dismissed small tablets, saying something along the lines of users needing sandpaper to make their fingers small enough to use them? That was in October 2010. The first generation iPad Mini launched in November 2012.

There are other examples of similar flip-flop from Apple, based on what users and the market demand. While anecdotal, this poll shows there's some demand for a touch-enabled Mac. Let's just hope someone at Apple is listening.

Recommends

The 100+ best October Prime Day deals you can buy: Live updatesThe 5 best VPN services (and tips to choose the right one for you)The best Android phones you can buy (including a surprise pick)The best robot vacuum and mop combos (and if they're worth the money)

• The 100+ best October Prime Day deals you can buy: Live updates
• The 5 best VPN services (and tips to choose the right one for you)
• The best Android phones you can buy (including a surprise pick)
• The best robot vacuum and mop combos (and if they're worth the money)