The US District Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers has issued their ruling in the Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc. case and a permanent injunction, related to Apple charging a 30% commission for digital goods and services offered on its platforms. Epic also alleged that such behaviour by Apple constituted monopolist behaviour under antitrust laws.
According to the permanent injunction, Apple must allow developers to provide links or other communications that can direct users away from Apple in-app purchasing. As far as monopolistic behaviour is concerned, the judge ruled that Apple was not a monopolist and 'success is not illegal.'
'Given the trial record, the Court cannot ultimately conclude that Apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws,' the judge concluded.
Register Email now for Weekly Promotion Stock
100% free, Unsubscribe any time!Add 1: Room 605 6/F FA YUEN Commercial Building, 75-77 FA YUEN Street, Mongkok KL, HongKong Add 2: Room 405, Building E, MeiDu Building, Gong Shu District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
Whatsapp/Tel: +8618057156223 Tel: 0086 571 86729517 Tel in HK: 00852 66181601
Email: [email protected]